All articles
QBCC Compliance

How the QBCC Treats Related Party Loans and Unpaid Present Entitlements (UPEs) on Your Balance Sheet

Related party loans and Unpaid Present Entitlements (UPEs) are the number one trigger for QBCC audit rejections and current ratio failures. Here is how the QBCC treats these balances and how to structure them defensibly.

Brendan Bassa22 October 20268 min read

The balance sheet entries that trigger instant QBCC audits

When the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) assesses an MFR Report or an Annual Financial Report, their forensic analysts do not simply look at your bottom-line net asset number. They scrutinise the quality and liquidity of individual balance sheet line items.

Two of the most heavily audited items in construction accounting are Related Party Loans and Unpaid Present Entitlements (UPEs).

Treated casually, these entries can disqualify your Net Tangible Assets (NTA), drop your current ratio below the mandatory 1:1 threshold, and trigger a formal licence audit or immediate show-cause notice.

The QBCC rules on related party receivables

It is common practice for a builder or director to loan money between related entities — for example, from an operating building company to a property development arm, or directly to a shareholder.

However, under the QBCC Minimum Financial Requirements (MFR) Regulation:

  • Any money owed to the licensed contractor by a related entity, shareholder, or director is classified as a related party asset.
  • The QBCC strictly disallows related party loans from counting towards your Net Tangible Assets unless the borrower can independently prove they have sufficient liquid assets to repay the loan on demand.

If your building company shows $200,000 on its balance sheet as a loan to a director or sister entity, the QBCC will automatically deduct that $200,000 from your allowable NTA unless full, audited financial statements of the related entity are provided proving serviceability.

If that deduction pushes your NTA below your Category requirement, your licence is immediately deemed non-compliant.

Unpaid Present Entitlements (UPEs) on the liability side

If your licensed builder entity operates as a unit trust or discretionary trust, profit distributions resolved at 30 June but not physically paid across create Unpaid Present Entitlements owed to beneficiaries.

The QBCC treats UPEs with extreme severity:

  • Under QBCC accounting standards, a UPE owed to a beneficiary is treated as a current liability.
  • Current liabilities are the denominator in your Current Ratio calculation (Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities).
  • Even if your overall NTA is adequate, an unmanaged UPE will blow out current liabilities, dropping your current ratio well below the mandatory 1:1 ratio.

A current ratio of 0.85:1 means automatic failure of your MFR test, regardless of how many millions of dollars you have in equipment or pipeline work.

How to structure related party balances correctly

To maintain both ATO compliance and QBCC licence security, related party balances must be structured with deliberate legal precision:

  1. Subordination and Deeds of Covenant: Where related party debt is owed by the licensee to a director, the debt can be subordinated via a legally drafted deed, moving it from a current liability to non-current equity, instantly repairing the current ratio.

  2. Formal Division 7A Loan Agreements: Where funds are loaned out from a company, formal 7-year agreements with benchmark interest rates must be in place to prevent deemed dividends under tax law, supported by verifiable liquid asset evidence to satisfy QBCC reviewers.

  3. Clearing UPEs Through Capitalisation: Where trusts hold QBCC licences, UPEs should either be physically settled via cash transfer or formalised into equity units to eliminate current liability exposure. (Or better yet, transition the licence into a proprietary limited company).

What the QBCC analyst checks when reviewing your lodgement

When your annual reporting or MFR report lands on the QBCC desk, the analyst will immediately cross-reference:

  • Are there loans to directors or associates?
  • Have you provided independent asset evidence for those borrowers?
  • Are loans classified as current or non-current?
  • Has interest been commercially charged and paid?

If the documentation is missing, the QBCC will issue an MFR Clarification Notice with a strict 14-day turnaround. Attempting to scramble legal loan agreements during that 14-day window is stressful, costly, and heavily scrutinised.

How regular catch-ups protect your balance sheet

Related party movements happen continuously throughout the year as directors draw funds, pay personal expenses from trading accounts, or transfer funds across projects.

Through our monthly and quarterly catch-up cadence:

  • We reconcile inter-entity transactions as they occur, ensuring no unapproved related-party asset is created.
  • We monitor your current ratio monthly so that UPEs or tax accruals never drag you below 1:1.
  • We ensure all related-party agreements are documented, executed, and compliant before the QBCC requests verification.

If your balance sheet holds director loans or inter-company balances, do not wait for the QBCC to flag them. Call the direct line and let us review your ledger with commercial precision.

The Direct Line

Put it into structure

If this article touched a nerve, that's where we start — book a direct conversation with the principal.

    base44
    Edit with Base44